Sorry, I've been thinking about this on several tracks at once. One of the things I was thinking about is how this other thing I brought up and you did not, the theater of rage, is in fact useful at times, and I considered deploying it there, so I was actually responding to my own thoughts there, not yours. Probably I was responding to my own thoughts all the way down the line, I think, now that I see that I find myself agreeing with almost everything you're saying here.
I want to stay mostly around 60-75 on that scale, with occasional dips to 40. I don't know how to calibrate, though. I think that I was more likely around 50. I do think that deferring to the tone argument is a way to let the eliminationists and apologists win, too: I wasn't so much worried about whether someone would call me on my tone but whether anybody would get what I was trying to tell them. Not necessarily that child, though it would have been nice, but anybody at all reading the exchange.
Like you, I've been troubled by the simplistic discussion of appropriation that has been taking place. I want to say to some people, wait, don't you have a right to Hermes and Prometheus simply by virtue of being human? So doesn't that person over there have a right to Iktomi and Coyote (for example, or Anansi, or whatever)? But there's clearly something else, something people do that is based on privilege and arrogance and ignorance, and that's what the sims child was doing.
The thing I want to say about having no innocence in this, and that I mean when I also say at times that I have no standing, is another thing that is possibly not about this issue at all but which gets triggered for me when this issue comes up. This (http://www.geocities.ws/lakota_culture/luis.html) is my father. Where other people can claim ethnicities or nationalities or communities -- I'm an anthro-revolutionary or some damned thing by heritage. And honestly, that's pretty problematic. Right now, I largely make a living off of being "understanding" about other people's cultures. I'm practically what we used to call a "poverty pimp." (except I'm not. Except I can't exactly explain why I'm not. Because I'm actually a teacher? I don't know).
Anyway, this is too complicated for me. But the thing that started this off seems pretty simple now that I've veered off into thinking about these other things.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
timeasmymeasure
no subject
I want to stay mostly around 60-75 on that scale, with occasional dips to 40. I don't know how to calibrate, though. I think that I was more likely around 50. I do think that deferring to the tone argument is a way to let the eliminationists and apologists win, too: I wasn't so much worried about whether someone would call me on my tone but whether anybody would get what I was trying to tell them. Not necessarily that child, though it would have been nice, but anybody at all reading the exchange.
Like you, I've been troubled by the simplistic discussion of appropriation that has been taking place. I want to say to some people, wait, don't you have a right to Hermes and Prometheus simply by virtue of being human? So doesn't that person over there have a right to Iktomi and Coyote (for example, or Anansi, or whatever)? But there's clearly something else, something people do that is based on privilege and arrogance and ignorance, and that's what the sims child was doing.
The thing I want to say about having no innocence in this, and that I mean when I also say at times that I have no standing, is another thing that is possibly not about this issue at all but which gets triggered for me when this issue comes up. This (http://www.geocities.ws/lakota_culture/luis.html) is my father. Where other people can claim ethnicities or nationalities or communities -- I'm an anthro-revolutionary or some damned thing by heritage. And honestly, that's pretty problematic. Right now, I largely make a living off of being "understanding" about other people's cultures. I'm practically what we used to call a "poverty pimp." (except I'm not. Except I can't exactly explain why I'm not. Because I'm actually a teacher? I don't know).
Anyway, this is too complicated for me. But the thing that started this off seems pretty simple now that I've veered off into thinking about these other things.
Do I make any sense at all?