July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:30 pm

Posted by Carolyn Jones

Students line up in the courtyard at Stege Elementary School in Richmond on Feb. 6, 2023. Photo by Shelby Knowles for CalMatters

In summary

In the latest state enrollment data released, California had 230,443 homeless students — a 9.3% increase from the previous year.

In Kern County, the first rule in counting homeless students is not saying “homeless.”

Instead, school staff use phrases like “struggling with stable housing” or “families in transition.” The approach seems to have worked: More families are sharing their housing status with their children’s schools, which means more students are getting services.

“There’s a lot of stigma attached to the word ‘homeless,’” said Curt Williams, director of homeless and foster youth services for the Kern County Office of Education. “When you remove that word, it all changes.”

Largely as a result of better identification methods, Kern County saw its homeless student population jump 10% last year, to 7,200. Those students received transportation to and from school, free school supplies, tutoring and other services intended to help them stay in school. For the purposes of this data, the definition of homelessness is broader than the state’s point in time count.

The trend is reflected statewide. In the latest state enrollment data released last month, California had 230,443 homeless students — a 9.3% increase from the previous year. Some of the increase is due to the state’s ongoing housing shortage, but most of the increase is because of better identification, advocates and school officials said.

Homeless students face numerous obstacles in school. They have higher rates of discipline and absenteeism, and fare worse academically. Last year, only 16% of homeless students met the state’s math standard, some of the lowest scores of any student group.

“Schools can’t solve homelessness, but they can ensure the students are safe in the classroom and getting the education they need to get out of homelessness,” said Barbara Duffield, executive director of Schoolhouse Connection, a national homeless youth advocacy group. “That starts with identifying the child who’s homeless.”

Challenges of counting homeless students

Under the federal McKinney-Vento Act, schools are required to count their homeless students throughout the school year and ensure they receive services. Homeless students also have the right to stay enrolled in their original school even if they move.

For many years, schools struggled to identify homeless students. Under state law, schools must distribute forms at the beginning of the school year asking families where they live — in their own homes, in motels, doubled-up with other families, in shelters, cars or outdoors. 

Column chart from 2014-15 to 2024-25 school year showing annual number of enrolled homeless students. The 230.4k homeless students in 2024-25 is the highest in the decade.

Some schools were less-than-diligent about collecting the form, or reassuring families understood the importance. Often, homeless families were reluctant to submit the form because they were afraid the school might contact a child welfare agency. Immigrant families sometimes feared the school might notify immigration authorities. And some families didn’t realize that sharing quarters with another family — by far the most common living situation among homeless families – is technically defined as homeless, at least under McKinney-Vento. 

A 2021 bill by former Assemblymember Luz Rivas, a Democrat from Arleta in the San Fernando Valley, sought to fix that problem. The bill requires schools to train everyone who works with students — from bus drivers to cafeteria workers to teachers — on how to recognize potential signs of homelessness. That could include families who move frequently or don’t reply to school correspondence.

The bill seems to have helped. Last year, the state identified 21,000 more homeless students than it had the previous year, even as overall enrollment dropped.

Still, that’s probably an undercount, researchers said. The actual homeless student population is probably between 5% and10% of those students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, according to the National Center for Homeless Education. In California, that would be a shortfall of up to 138,713 students.

Influx of funding

Another boost for identifying homeless students came from the American Rescue Plan, the federal COVID-19 relief package. The plan included $800 million for schools to hire counselors or train existing staff to help homeless students. Nearly all schools in California received some money.

About 120 districts in California won grant money through the McKinney-Vento Act, which last year dispersed about $15.9 million in California to pay for things like rides to school, backpacks, staff and other services. Districts are chosen on a competitive basis; not all districts that apply receive funds.

But those funding sources are drying up. Most of the pandemic relief money has already been spent, and President Donald Trump’s recently approved budget does not include McKinney-Vento funding for 2026-27.

The cuts come at a time when advocates expect steep increases in the number of homeless families over the next few years, due in part to national policy changes. Republican budget proposals include cuts to Medicaid, food assistance and other programs aimed at helping low-income families, while the immigration crackdown has left thousands of families afraid to seek assistance. For families living on tight budgets, those cuts could lead to a loss of housing.

And in California, the shortage of affordable housing continues to be a hurdle for low-income families. Even Kern County, which has traditionally been a less pricey option for families, has seen a spike in housing costs as more residents move there from Los Angeles. 

Joseph Bishop, an education professor at UCLA and co-author of a recent report on homeless students nationwide, said the loss of government funding will be devastating for homeless students. 

“California is the epicenter of the homeless student crisis, and we need targeted, dedicated support,” Bishop said. “Folks should be extremely alarmed right now. Will these kids be getting the education they need and deserve?” 

Better food, cleaner bathrooms

In Kern County, identification has only been one part of the effort to help homeless students thrive in school. Schools also try to pair them with tutors and mentors, give them school supplies and laundry tokens, and invite them to join a program called Student Voice Ambassadors. There, students can tour local colleges, learn leadership skills and explore career options. 

As part of the program, staff ask students what would make school more enticing — and then make sure the suggestions happen. At one school, students said they’d go to class if the bathrooms were cleaner. So staff improved the bathrooms. At another school, students wanted better food. They got it.

Williams credits the program with reducing absenteeism among homeless students. Two years ago, 45% of Kern County’s homeless students were chronically absent. Last year, the number dropped to 39% – still too high, he said, but a significant improvement.

“Without McKinney-Vento funds, the Student Voice Ambassador program would go away,” Williams said. “How will we keep it going? I don’t know.”

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:30 pm

Posted by Scott Hayman

A large irrigation pump and water well sit in a dry patch of dirt beside a green farm field under a clear blue sky. Water flows out of a rust-stained pipe into a weathered concrete barrel. Several yellow plastic lubricant buckets are scattered around the base of the equipment, and hay bales and agricultural structures can be seen in the distance.

Guest Commentary written by

Scott Hayman

Scott Hayman

Scott Hayman is chair of the Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Authority.

California is at a groundwater management crossroads as legal loopholes threaten to undo the state’s progress toward responsible groundwater sustainability.

At the core of this legal conflict are two legal processes. The first is the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, the landmark law passed in 2014 to bring order to overdrafting of basins and ensure long-term sustainability of the state’s groundwater resources. The second is groundwater adjudications, a legal tool to determine water rights of who can pump water and how much they can use.  

Increasingly, these two legal processes are clashing. As a result, it is causing confusion, delaying  implementation of groundwater sustainability plans and further putting California’s water future at risk. In fact, nearly a quarter of state-approved groundwater sustainability plans are being challenged in a groundwater adjudication. 

Litigants are using groundwater adjudications to challenge the technical findings of state-approved groundwater plans, data from the Department of Water Resources reveals. These plans are the product of years of science-based research, independent modeling, local stakeholder input and millions of dollars in public investment. 

The lawsuits bypass groundwater management law and are dragging every groundwater user in a basin into costly, years-long litigation, which ultimately is paid for by users who did not choose this water battle. The result? Delayed projects, regulatory uncertainty and a system that favors those who can afford to litigate over those who can’t. 

One of these legal challenges involves the critically overdrafted Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Basin, 597 square miles spanning Kern, Inyo and San Bernardino counties. As the chair of the groundwater authority responsible for managing this basin, I know firsthand the detriment of these legal loopholes.

Assembly Bill 1413 is sensible, straightforward legislation that would strengthen the state’s efforts to manage this precious resource. AB 1413 is intended to protect the right to challenging a sustainability plan, but at the same time, preserve the integrity of the groundwater law’s process and provide clarity to judges in adjudications.

AB 1413 addresses this growing problem by reaffirming the Legislature’s original intent: To afford the ability to challenge a sustainability plan by first introducing evidence as part of a validation  action. This process would be open, transparent and focused — unlike adjudications, which are  broad, expensive and often heard in a court far removed from the communities they affect.

Clarity is needed now. Judges in current adjudications have voiced frustration at the lack of legal  guidance, noting the difficulty of reconciling state law with the demands of adjudication. AB 1413 gives them the tools they need to respect both processes without compromising either. 

The bill also does not take away anyone’s legal rights. It simply ensures that technical disputes are handled in the appropriate venue, without undermining broader groundwater management law. 

Opponents state that adjudications and groundwater management law are separate and can coexist. But in practice, adjudications are being used to override local efforts and delay  sustainability measures.

This isn’t coexistence — it’s conflict.

Without legislative action, this conflict will only grow, negatively impacting most groundwater users, and leaving it to legal teams who can afford to fight for wealthy clients who simply want to kick the implementation of sustainability plans down the road. 

AB 1413 is not just a legal fix. It’s a defense of public process, scientific integrity and equitable  access to water governance. It ensures that all Californians — not just those with the deepest  pockets — have a voice in how our groundwater is managed. 

If lawmakers pass AB 1413, they can reaffirm California’s commitment to sustainable, community-driven water management. The future of our groundwater and the communities that depend on it are at stake.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:30 pm

Posted by Yue Stella Yu

Construction teams work at the Quito Village Development Project in Saratoga on April 13, 2023. Photo by Martin do Nascimento, CalMatters

In summary

For months, a plan to create an infrastructure financing agency largely shielded from the public eye sailed smoothly through the state Senate. Lawmakers only backtracked when transparency advocates sounded the alarm.

California lawmakers wanted to create a nonprofit agency authorized to borrow limitless taxpayer money to finance infrastructure projects — all while shielding most of its operations from the public eye.

Sponsored by state Treasurer Fiona Ma, SB 769 would create the Golden State Infrastructure Corporation, a nonprofit organization within the treasurer’s office that would use public and private financing for projects from transportation to housing. 

The measure initially sought to exclude virtually all of the nonprofit’s records from public disclosure and allow the organization to make decisions behind closed doors.

That kind of authority deserves public scrutiny, good government groups argued, especially as corruption scandals plagued state agencies in recent decades. The proposal follows state officials’ efforts in recent years to shroud themselves in secrecy by using burner phones and non-disclosure agreements and by introducing measures to reduce public access to records and meetings.

After good government advocates and legislative analysts raised transparency concerns, lawmakers on Tuesday approved a new version of the bill that narrows the scope of documents that would be exempt from public disclosure, though it would still allow some to remain secret.

“This is exactly the kind of business (of) the state the public has a vested interest in being able to monitor. Excessive secrecy will only undermine public trust in the corporation,” the First Amendment Coalition and Oakland Privacy wrote in a joint letter to lawmakers last month.

The nonprofit would be overseen by a five-member board including the treasurer, controller and other state appointees. 

The proposal would give the organization full discretion over its finances and would not cap how much debt it can incur. The state would also not be held liable for the organization’s financial decisions. 

Some documents would still be secret

Under the revised legislation, the nonprofit would only be allowed to keep records private if they are corporate financial documents or “critical infrastructure information” that has not been made public. The group would also only be able to hold closed sessions while discussing those records.

“I believe the amendments we are taking today strengthen the bill and strike the right balance,” Sen. Anna Caballero, a Merced Democrat who authored the measure, said in a hearing Tuesday. “It will ensure the success of the infrastructure fund while maintaining the type of open and transparent governmental body the public deserves.”

Neither Caballero nor Ma responded to CalMatters’ request for comment Tuesday on why they sought to keep deliberations and records secret. 

The initial sweeping exemptions went unnoticed for months as the measure sailed through the Senate with no lawmaker raising transparency concerns. The only two senators to vote against the legislation — Sens. Brian Jones of San Diego and Steven Choi of Irvine, both Republicans — did not cite the exemptions as part of their concern. 

When asked about the lack of disclosure, Jones said in a statement that he’s deeply opposed to the entity “being completely exempt from the Public Records Act, especially in California, where government is already notorious for its lack of transparency.”

Choi spokesperson Kelley Rooney told CalMatters: “Senator Choi has consistently voted in favor of legislation that promotes government transparency and public input in the decision-making process.”

A worker guides a crane lifting material for construction on a segment of the high speed rail outside of Hanford on Oct. 20, 2023. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local
A worker guides a crane lifting material for construction on a segment of the high-speed rail outside of Hanford on Oct. 20, 2023. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local

Ginny LaRoe, advocacy director of the First Amendment Coalition, told CalMatters she only flagged the proposed exemptions after the measure arrived in the Assembly. She said she wished lawmakers had raised the issue early on in the legislative process.

“We would have better policy debates, and ultimately, better policy if these key public interest provisions were analyzed and discussed early,” she said. “It’s probably not good government if we’re only really grappling with the public’s right to information and meetings at the very end stages of legislative proposals.”

While the proposal limits the nonprofit’s discretion to hold private meetings, Tracy Rosenberg, advocacy director of Oakland Privacy, told CalMatters she hopes the discretion wouldn’t be abused.

“We would hope that when taxpayer money is involved, you know, the (open meetings laws) should just apply without all these special carve-outs,” she said.

Other proposals to block transparency loom

The infrastructure proposal is only one of many this year that would exempt state entities from the open meetings law or reduce their public disclosure requirements, according to a CalMatters analysis. Most of those measures cite concerns about releasing sensitive, investigative or proprietary information as rationale.

At least three proposals would completely shield various entities such as task forces, working groups and advisory committees from the state’s open meetings requirement. They’ve all cleared the Assembly and are being debated in Senate committees.

Another proposal green lit by the Assembly is AB1103 by Democratic Assemblymember Chris Ward of San Diego. It would shield certain members of the Research Advisory Panel of California, a controlled substance study review group, from the open meetings law, and allow the group to continue meeting in private. Members of the group stopped meeting altogether in 2023 after being subject to open meetings requirements, arguing they could not publicly discuss studies without violating copyright and patent protections.

Additional measures aim to loosen public disclosure requirements and reduce the scope of records the state is required to release. One of them, AB 973 by GOP Assemblymember Josh Hoover of Folsom, would allow plastic manufacturers to ask CalRecycle to keep information they submit to the department private. Under the legislation, the department director could grant that request if they believe doing so “is not detrimental to the public interest.”

Two other measures, SB 495 by Sen. Ben Allen and AB 1339 by Assemblymember Mark Gonzalez, would require insurers to report more information to the state but would keep it from public disclosure. 

And AB 1504, authored by Assemblymember Marc Berman, a Palo Alto Democrat, would have subjected the California Massage Therapy Council, a nonprofit created by the state to certify massage therapists, to the California Public Records Act. 

Berman balked after the language drew fierce opposition from district attorneys and massage therapists, some of whom argued the requirements represent “government interference with the right of private parties” and would identify the council as a “quasi-public entity” 16 years after it was created. His current proposal merely “encourages” the council to make its information public.

“Despite the significant amendments, I still believe that greater transparency is essential for this Council to remain trusted and effective,” Berman said in a Monday hearing.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:30 pm

Posted by Deborah Brennan

our U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, wearing jackets labeled "POLICE" and "ERO" (Enforcement and Removal Operations), escort a handcuffed individual down a narrow hallway in what appears to be an office or apartment building. One officer carries a red folder as they proceed under fluorescent lighting.

In summary

Church officials complained after several men on the grounds of two Inland Empire Catholic churches were detained by immigration enforcement officers.

ICE arrests near two churches in San Bernardino County last month show how ramped up immigration enforcement is disturbing places that were once deemed protected.

On June 20 federal agents picked up a longtime parishioner of Our Lady of Lourdes Church in Montclair on church property, according to the National Catholic Reporter. In a separate incident that day, agents chased several men onto the church parking lot of St. Adelaide parish in Highland. 

Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin disputed what she said were news reports that agents had entered the church hall. 

“The accusation that ICE entered a church to make an arrest are FALSE,” she stated in an email to CalMatters.  “ICE conducted a traffic stop on an illegal alien on June 20 in the general proximity of Our Lady of Lourdes Church, Montclair, California. The illegal alien chose to pull into the church parking lot. Officers then safely made the arrest.”

For almost a decade and a half, U.S. immigration officers steered clear of churches, complying with a directive by former President Barack Obama that limited immigration enforcement at sensitive locations, including schools, hospitals and places of worship. Former President Joe Biden maintained those guidelines to deter immigration action in areas that provide essential services.

On his inauguration day Jan. 20, President Donald Trump revoked that protection, stating that the Biden-era restrictions “thwart law enforcement in or near so-called ‘sensitive’ areas.” 

Catholic leaders have denounced ICE’s aggressive enforcement tactics and protested that many detained immigrants are denied the right to plead their cases.

“Authorities are now seizing brothers and sisters indiscriminately, without respect for their right to due process and their dignity as children of God,” wrote Bishop Alberto Rojas, of the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Bernardino, in a letter to parishioners June 23.

John Andrews, a spokesman for the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Bernardino, said the man detained at Our Lady of Lourdes is a longtime parishioner whose family is involved in the ministry. 

“There was no one present at Our Lady of Lourdes when he was taken into custody,” Andrews told CalMatters in an email. “He was doing some landscaping work there. He is in custody so there is no one who can really speak to what transpired in that apprehension.”

The men arrested at St. Adelaide Church didn’t appear to have a connection to the parish, Andrews said: “Neither the parish nor the diocese has any information about them, their whereabouts or whether or not they were arrested.”

Rojas stated in his letter that church leaders respect law enforcement efforts to keep communities safe from violent criminals, but raiding homes, workplaces and churches creates fear and confusion: “It is not of the Gospel of Jesus Christ — which guides us in all that we do.”

He asked elected leaders to “reconsider and cease these tactics immediately, in favor of an approach that respects human rights and human dignity and builds toward a more lasting, comprehensive reform of our immigration system.”

The Catholic Church has been increasingly vocal on the plight of immigrants and refugees in recent years. The late Pope Francis traveled to Sicily to meet with immigrants from Libya on his first pastoral visit outside Rome and later rescued 12 Syrians from a refugee camp in Greece. As Trump took office in January, Pope Francis denounced his mass deportation plans as “a disgrace.”

On June 20, the day of the Inland Empire church arrests, also World Refugee Day, Michael Pham, the newly appointed bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego, joined a group of clergy to witness immigration proceedings at the federal building in San Diego. 

Pham came to the U.S. as a refugee from Vietnam in 1981. He told reporters that he prayed for “wisdom and insight to help our poor brothers … through the crises in their lives.”

The raids also are beginning to draw criticism from some California Republican lawmakers. Six signed a June 27 letter calling for more moderate immigration action, arguing that raids are hurting communities and businesses.

The lawmakers — including state Sen. Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, a Redlands Republican — endorsed the letter by Senator Suzette Martinez Valladares, a Santa Clarita Republican, asking Trump to “focus deportations on criminals” and modernize immigration policies.

While they support immigration enforcement against violent criminals, they said, immigrants without criminal records are being swept up in raids, “creating widespread fear.”

ICE workplace raids at farms, construction sites, restaurants and hotels, “are harming the communities we represent and the businesses that employ our constituents,” the letter states.

The lawmakers are asking for comprehensive immigration reform, expansion of work visas and a path to legal status for non-criminal immigrants.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:29 pm

Posted by Cayla Mihalovich

People wearing orange jumpsuits and brown hat stand in line and look towards their right while surrounded by other people in a legislative room.

In summary

California sent incarcerated firefighters to battle blazes in Los Angeles this year. It’s moving toward paying them minimum wage for their work in emergencies.

In a historic policy change, California is moving to pay incarcerated firefighters the federal minimum wage during active fires. 

The wage increase, funded through the new state budget, follows years of advocacy to improve pay and working conditions for incarcerated labor. That effort took on a new urgency after hundreds of incarcerated firefighters were deployed to battle deadly wildfires that hit Los Angeles in January. 

Incarcerated firefighters currently earn between $5.80 and $10.24 per day, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. During active emergencies, Cal Fire compensates them an additional $1 per hour. 

That appears to be changing. Gov. Gavin Newsom last week signed a new state budget with $10 million to pay incarcerated firefighters $7.25 an hour when they’re on a fire. It will take effect Jan. 1 as long as the Legislature passes a bill that would mandate the policy.

“It’s the right thing to do and it’s long overdue,” said Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, a Democrat from Culver City who authored the bill that would raise incarcerated firefighter pay. “It feels really beautiful and life changing for folks who have sacrificed to save others during their time being held accountable for whatever harms they may have caused in their past.” 

Bryan initially set out to raise wages for incarcerated firefighters to $19 per hour, but settled on the federal minimum wage after budget negotiations. The bill, which received bipartisan support from nearly two dozen lawmakers, was opposed by the California State Sheriffs’ Association over concerns of its potential fiscal impact on counties. 

“To have a bipartisan moment where we’re dignifying incarcerated labor with a federal minimum wage – I think that is the best of who we are,” said Bryan. “My colleagues on both sides of the aisle, on this particular effort, are demonstrating what it really means to be Californian.”

Bryan introduced the bill after voters last year rejected a ballot measure that would have ended forced labor in prisons and jails. California’s incarcerated firefighters have long provided critical support to state, local and federal government agencies in responding to various emergencies, including wildfires and floods. 

Over 1,800 incarcerated firefighters live year-round in minimum-security conservation camps, also known as “fire camps,” located across 25 counties in California, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Those numbers have dwindled in recent years due to a declining prison population. 

The wage increase is an acknowledgment to the people fighting the fires, said Katie Dixon, policy and campaign coordinator for the organization California Coalition for Women Prisoners, which supported Bryan’s bill. 

“I feel like this is a statement of value – in saying: we value you, we honor you, we see you,” said Dixon. 

Dixon dreamed of becoming a firefighter after spending two years on a hand crew while she was incarcerated. But despite her experience fighting hundreds of fires, she found that the career path was not available to her when she was released from prison in 2012 due to her criminal record. 

“It felt like a dream deferred. A dream that’s been cut off due to systemic policies designed to keep people like me — Black people — out of certain professions,” said Dixon. “Deep down inside, I’m supposed to be a battalion chief.”

Both state and federal legislation have been introduced this year to try and shore up the pipeline for incarcerated people to land in firefighting careers once they’ve been released. 

U.S. Reps. Sydney Kamlager-Dove and Judy Chu, both from California, introduced a bill that would establish national protections for incarcerated firefighters, including a uniform framework to clear their records that would ease the barriers to employment. 

“As we are seeing departments contract, as we are seeing that it is harder to recruit and retain firefighters, why would you miss an opportunity like this to connect a pipeline that is trained right into municipalities that need more firefighters?” said Kamlager-Dove. “At the end of the day, it’s jobs and economic stability that help all of us.” 

Cayla Mihalovich is a California Local News fellow.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:31 pm

Posted by Robert Farley

Kentucky’s GOP Senate primary is kicking into gear:

Among the claims being made: Nate Morris has undergone an “embarrassing” political makeover, and Andy Barr is “bought by woke banks.” And “Fake Nate” Morris is the subject of a whole website created by Daniel Cameron’s team. Morris, a Lexington tech and insurance entrepreneur, entered the race late last week with an announcement on Donald Trump Jr.’s podcast. He joined former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron and current 6th Congressional District Rep. Andy Barr in the GOP field. The field is likely set and the knives are definitely out.

The change in how this state has thought about Mitch McConnell is dizzying:

Meanwhile, Morris has been lobbing bombs from well before the word “go,” and they only grew more intense once the campaign began in earnest. His first ad, “Garbage Day,” featured him literally throwing representations of McConnell, Barr and Cameron in a garbage truck; the setting was relevant for Morris given his history with Rubicon. Morris has centered his campaign around denigrating McConnell, going harshest of the three GOP candidates with significant name ID on the 83-year-old senator. The prevailing theme of his first rally, held alongside conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, was to “rid the nation of the stench of Mitch.“ He also made negative comments about Barr’s physical appearance as well as speculated about Cameron’s standing among McConnell donors during an appearance on a show hosted by Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser and prominent figure in the American far right.

I dunno if Loomis has Mitch in his list of obituaries, but it is very interesting to me that collectively the KY GOPsters that Mitch has carefully and painstakingly cultivated over the last three decades would probably pen a more acidic obit than Loomis could ever dream of. A decade ago Mitch had enormous influence over this party, albeit influence that could be overstated (his candidates lost the 2010 Senate primary and the 2015 gubernatorial primary). Now he would have to move up several levels of esteem to reach “persona non grata” with the Kentucky Republican Party. It’s the kind of vitriol Democrats normally reserve for a Lieberman/Sinema/Manchin type character (probably unfairly to Manchin if not the other two) although McConnell sins aren’t legislative (he votes GOP) but rather a lack of fealty to Trump.

I wonder whether they will attend his funeral and what they will say in his memory, these men who owe their careers to Mitch…

The post This Is Going to Be Entertaining… appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 11:25 am

Posted by Josh

Comics Curmudgeon readers! Do you love this blog and yearn for a novel written by its creator? Well, good news: Josh Fruhlinger's The Enthusiast is that novel! It's even about newspaper comic strips, partly. Check it out!

Beetle Bailey, 7/2/25

Longtime readers know that one of my minor Beetle Bailey fixations is that Miss Buxley’s classic little black dress is actually a little red dress; it’s just that the daily strips depict black and white versions of underlying platonic forms that are in color, and red is depicted as black in that context, but then the strips are colored in by other hands later in the manufacturing chain, which screws up the whole system because the black apparently can’t be made red at that point. Or it least it couldn’t be made red, until today! Finally, Adobe Photoshop fill tool technology has advanced to the point where it can make the black area of a .tiff file red. Unfortunately it seems to screw up a bunch of other stuff, like make the text too small for the word bubbles and also kind of fuck up Miss Buxley’s face. It looks off, right? Is this AI? Will Walker-Browne Amalgamated Humor Industries LLC be the first comics conglomerate to replace its human artists with AI? Anyway, I was going to do a riff here about the fact that “going pillow shopping” clearly seems like it should be a sex thing, but I got distracted by all this other stuff.

Bizarro, 7/2/25

Look, man, I love dogs. Huge fan of dogs. But the truth is, no dog, not even a highly trained one, would give even a moment’s thought to a beautiful sunset vista. This guy should be getting a phone call describing the incredible smells coming off a huge pile of turds that the dog found.

Hi and Lois, 7/2/25

Hey, Trixie, the Sun is an enormous ball of exploding hydrogen and helium more than 800,000 miles in diameter, and its motion is mostly determined by the gravitational forces of our galaxy, which contains millions of stars like it. You, on the other hand, are a baby with no job or anything else that imposes any kind of schedule on your days, so maybe you should be willing to accommodate your supposed “best friend.”

Barney Google and Snuffy Smith, 7/2/25

Aww, isn’t that nice? But seriously, insulin deliveries to Hootin’ Holler are intermittent at best, which is a big problem considering the community’s higher-than-average incidence of diabetes.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 12:00 pm

Posted by Dan Walters

A construction worker operates a large John Deere excavator, digging and moving dirt at an urban construction site. The excavator is positioned in front of a modern white apartment building with balconies. A chain-link fence runs along the left edge of the image, and the sky is overcast.

Jerry Brown once described reform of the California Environmental Quality Act as “the lord’s work” but he, like other recent governors, was not willing to invest enough political capital to change it.

Simply put, significantly altering CEQA, which then-Gov. Ronald Reagan signed more than a half-century ago, would require confronting two powerful interest groups: environmental organizations and labor unions, which have weaponized the law to achieve their goals.

Brown made one stab at compelling the Legislature to alter CEQA in 2016, but otherwise left it to his successor, Gavin Newsom.

For six years, Newsom echoed the attitudes of his predecessors, critical of CEQA’s misuse to block housing and other much-needed projects, or compel developers to hire unionized labor or jump through other hoops, but unwilling to confront it head-on.

Instead, he and the Legislature nibbled at the edges of the law and gave specific projects, such as sports arenas, exemptions.

Finally, however, the social and economic costs of leaving CEQA intact became too high. The state’s critical shortage of housing continued despite innumerable policy declarations aimed at spurring investment. It became downright embarrassing that a politically dominant Democratic Party pledged to socioeconomic equity was unable to deliver on promises to make housing more abundant and affordable.

California starred in a New York Times video that chastised blue states for failing to live up to their stated principles and in a recent book, “Abundance,” about the nation’s chronic inability to deliver much-needed projects due to regulatory overkill, such as CEQA.

This year, with Newsom nearing the end of his governorship and appearing to cast his eyes toward a presidential campaign, the governor decided to confront the CEQA issue squarely. He endorsed two bills that would impose limits on the law’s reach and, in the end, threatening to block the entire state budget if they weren’t placed on his desk.

On Monday, the last day of the fiscal year, the Legislature passed Assembly Bill 130 and Senate Bill 131 with last-minute changes to dampen opposition from construction unions. Newsom quickly signed them.

“We needed to go bold and big on this holy grail reform,” Newsom said at a hastily staged signing ceremony.

Essentially, the legislation exempts virtually all infill housing projects from CEQA’s provisions, making it more difficult for opponents of high-density housing projects, known as NIMBYs, to block approval.

Such projects, particularly those aimed at low- and moderate-income families, have been the most difficult to gain approval, due largely to opposition in upscale communities dominated by single-family homeowners.

“When you are building housing in an existing community, that is environmentally beneficial, it is climate friendly, that is not something that should be subjected to potentially endless CEQA challenges and lawsuits,” Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat who authored SB 131, told senators before they passed the measure.

Wiener and Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks, an Oakland Democrat who carried AB 130, have been the Capitol’s two most aggressive advocates of pro-housing legislation.

The remaining question, of course, is whether the two new laws, which go into effect immediately, will have a discernible impact on the state’s housing shortage. CEQA is just one factor of many determining whether proposed projects proceed or die. Those who oppose high-density housing in their neighborhoods will not just roll over.

Ironically, as the Legislature was passing the two new laws on Monday, The Atlantic was publishing a lengthy article entitled “The Whole Country Is Starting to Look Like California,” that describes how red tape and local opposition are adversely affecting housing development in red states such as Texas and Florida, which had been viewed as developer paradises.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 11:12 am

Posted by Victor Mair

[This is a guest post by Barbara Phillips Long]

There is an interesting sidelight in commentary about an article in the New York Review of Books, which posits that the U.S. is two nations under one government, where the two entities exchange political power. The link to the NYRB (paywalled) article is here.

The Language Log topic comes from the commentary at the Lawyers, Guns and Money blog, which wonders aloud about how the Greek word/concept "polis" gets translated in various languages:

The concept of two nations doesn’t really track with the concept of political power remaining in “the people’s hands,” since the basically mystical concept of “the” people is usually thought, as a matter of political legitimation at least, to be more or less synonymous with the idea of “the” — as in one — nation.

This I think is somewhat obscured by the usages of the English language in regard to the underlying concept. Here’s the official government translation of the Constitution’s preamble into Spanish:

Nosotros, el pueblo de los Estados Unidos, con el fin de formar una Unión más perfecta, establecer la justicia, garantizar la tranquilidad nacional, atender a la defensa común, fomentar el bienestar general y asegurar los beneficios de la libertad para nosotros mismos y para nuestraposteridad, por la presente promulgamos y establecemos esta Constitución para los Estados Unidos de América.

“El pueblo” — literally “the town” — conjures up a more concrete and less metaphysically vague concept than “We the People.” Someone more learned in such matters can no doubt explain how the Greek word “polis” ended up being translated so much more literally in some languages than others, but I think this historical accident, if that’s what it is, could have considerable psychological/practical significance.

(source)

I thought Paul Campos made a good point about how "We, the people" does not convey the same rhetorical flourish in every language. Language Log readers are likely all aware of the pitfalls — and illuminations — of translation, but I confess I am curious about how many and different ways the Preamble and the concept of "polis" are expressed.

 

Selected readings

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 11:00 am

Posted by Erik Loomis

This is the grave of Emmett Till.

You know, I don’t really have anything to say here. We all the know the story of Emmett Till. We all know the horrors of lynching and the terribleness of a murderous Jim Crow society that allowed and even encouraged crackers to kill Black men or even small Black boys for supposed violations of the sexual boundaries between the races, boundaries they themselves broke all the time in the culture of sexual assault of Black women that was at Jim Crow’s core. We all know how the death of Till galvanized the nation and was a moment when it looked enough white people cared about civil rights enough that something could be done about the worst treatment of Black people possible. We know how incredibly, unbelievably brave Till’s mother was in demanding an open casket so that the nation could what those racist scumbags had done to her boy.

We also know that we are in far worse shape today than we were when Till was murdered in 1955 at the age of 14 in terms of white people caring about civil rights. We have not returned to the age of lynching yet, thank God. And we aren’t quite back to Jim Crow America yet. But we are sure moving there fast. Even in the Gilded Age, it took years for Jim Crow to be institutionalized. It didn’t happen then any faster than it is happening again now. But white people are pretty much inherently a plague on the planet and one of their victims was Emmett Till. Maybe someday again, whites will be motivated by seeing violence against people of color to do something about it. I doubt it will happen in my lifetime.

So I think we have plenty to discuss here without going over an all too short biography of a young boy killed by racist assholes.

Emmett Till is buried in Burr Oak Cemetery, Alsip, Illinois.

If you would like this series to visit other victims of white murders, you can donate to cover the required expenses here. Charles Hale, murdered in 1911, is in Lawrenceville, Georgia and Maceo Snipes, killed for voting in 1946, is in Butler, Georgia. Previous posts in this series are archived here and here.

The post Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 1,916 appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 10:46 am

Posted by Susie Madrak

The University of Pennsylvania will send “personalized” letters of apology to female athletes who felt aggrieved by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas’ participation on their team and restore Penn records and honors they would have won if not for Thomas, as part of an agreement reached with the federal government. Via the Philadelphia Inquirer:

Penn becomes the first Ivy League university to strike a truce with President Donald Trump’s administration —at least on this issue — since it began targeting some of the nation’s elite universities, threatening funding and damaging policy changes if they don’t comply with certain demands.

It was not immediately clear whether the deal would result in the restoration of $175 million in federal funding to Penn that the White House said was paused in March, citing Thomas’ participation.

According to a two-page document obtained by The Inquirer, Penn has also agreed to issue a public statement, which will be posted prominently on its website, saying that it will abide by Title IX — the civil rights law that prohibits sexual harassment and discrimination — “as interpreted by the Department of Education.” But the agreement is restricted only to athletics and doesn’t affect other areas of university operations.

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 10:45 am

Posted by Susie Madrak

King Con and the GOP’s so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” is deeply unpopular with the public. But fear not! JD Vance has assigned himself the job of selling it on the basis of how much money is going to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Via Rolling Stone:

Battling concerns from voters about increased barriers to accessing programs like Medicaid and food assistance; massive transfers of wealth from less fortunate Americans to corporations and the rich; and the mass deregulation of industries like crypto and AI, Vice President J.D. Vance is attempting a new tactic to persuade the hesitant: ignore all of that and focus on how much money the bill is giving to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits. The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass,” Vance wrote Monday night on X.

“Everything else — the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions,” he added.

Think about that. Medicaid = "minutiae."

read more