Consider who asked you the question. Of course I'm assuming you're not in favor of the Nazis.
I'm also taking as given that the killing of Jews was not about the killing of Jews. So that when we're looking at history, we're not just interested in the names of which people were at which end of the knife, or which people were at which end of the whip, but the processes that put them in their positions.
And that bit "the killing of Jews was not about the killing of Jews" so doesn't express what I meant to say. Which is that genocide isn't a Jew thing -- remember I say this as a Jew -- it's a political thing. And genocide is not the only thing to worry about in 1932. And that preventing the other things most likely prevents genocide too.
no subject
I'm also taking as given that the killing of Jews was not about the killing of Jews. So that when we're looking at history, we're not just interested in the names of which people were at which end of the knife, or which people were at which end of the whip, but the processes that put them in their positions.
no subject
no subject