July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, February 24th, 2007 01:00 pm




I'm pretty sure that this is a claytonia. It tastes like miner's lettuce, and it has that distinctive growth habit, though the leaves do not wrap around like miner's lettuce leaves do.

Here's what I know about it: it volunteered (I think) in my back yard. I may have planted it -- I certainly planted some claytonia seeds which I thought were miner's lettuce. But several claytonia species which can't really be called miner's lettuce are native to this area. Its details:

Plant is soft from root to flower. Roots are small. Leaves paired. Stems and flowers grow from the leaf joint. Flowers have 5 sepals and ten unfused acute petals. Pistils very small and uncountable at the the top of the ovary. Maybe there are 5 stamens. Ovary and calyx hairy. Ovary has five ovules. Calyx continues to grow after the flower drops, and encloses the ovary loosely while the seeds develop.

What troubles me is that I cannot find a claytonia, or indeed anything in the portulacaceae family, with petals like that. I've seen some provocative flowers -- ones with five petals that are obviously fused from ten -- but nothing with the ten tiny petals.

I did use the dichotomous key in the magnificent huge Jepson Manual of the Higher Plants of California, but as usual I didn't get much of anywhere with it. I was reduced to looking at every page of illustrations, and finally, I just followed my insticts and looked up miner's lettuce to see whether it fit at all. I found the simple pointy leaves for a couple of species. I found a flower that looked more like mine than the others do, but it's on a plant with a thick root and the leaves in a rosette at the soil level instead of trailing all over hell and gone like my plant does. I have, of course, google-imaged claytonia, but with less than satisfactory results.

On a related front, I have discovered that Bacopa, which is a trailing plant which is all the rage in the nurseries, is native to California. But the drawings indicate a much more gracile (and graceful) plant than the nurseries show. Which is the way it goes, in my observations: the dimwits who "improve and select" plants for gardens have a tendency to breed for bigger flowers and more flower-to-plant ratio, resulting in graceless abominations like the garden lupine -- which could be used for a baseball bat with more felicity than as a bedding plant.

ETA: Per the always brilliant Sal Towse, it's not claytonia, but stellaria: I think littoralis though the photo seems to show bigger, flatter flowers and squatter leaves than my guy has. This can easily be explained by the fact that theirs is from Point Reyes and dog knows where mine's from.
Tags:
Sunday, February 25th, 2007 12:50 am (UTC)
Do you always taste things growing in your yard?
Sunday, February 25th, 2007 12:56 am (UTC)
No, I just tasted this one because I was already thinking it was basically miner's lettuce. I'll taste other things that I'm pretty sure of. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't come up with a plant in my yard that would be seriously toxic in very small amounts, but I still wouldn't go chomping on things I don't know anything about.

I do know most of the plants in my yard, even the weeds.
Sunday, February 25th, 2007 03:07 am (UTC)
Do the other flowers on the plant have ten petals? My parents had a native bluebell (Wahlenbergia) in their garden, and one of the flowers one year had ten petals rather than five. So flower development sometimes just goes wonky.
Sunday, February 25th, 2007 06:21 am (UTC)
That's a thought . . . but they all have ten petals.
Sunday, February 25th, 2007 10:02 pm (UTC)
Could be Stellaria pubera: star chickweed

See this pic (http://www.earlham.edu/~biol/brents/field_botany/Sedgwicks2/stellaria_pubera2.jpg).
Sunday, February 25th, 2007 11:02 pm (UTC)
I think you're right about stellaria -- which means I didn't get the family right! -- but I think not pubera. When I get home I'll check Jepson again. Thanks for the lead!
Monday, February 26th, 2007 01:56 am (UTC)
Okay, I think it's stellaria (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/get_JM_treatment.pl?2907,3055,3060) littoralis (http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?query_src=photos_flora_sci&seq_num=10786&one=T).

So the main post's title will have to be edited.