If you were going to fly in and out of London, and the price was the same either way you did it, would you choose Gatwick or Stansted? Those are the choices, and there is apparently only a fifteen minute difference in arrival or departure.
The passenger has no special destination in London -- he's jusgt messing around on his way to California and back to Prague.
(our cheapest places to fly in and out of appeared to be London, Shannon, Dublin, Nice, Manchester, Krakow, and Malaga, in that order. The easiest places for him to get to, he said, were London and Krakow. London's cheaper than Krakow. Also probably simpler to wander in for a few days, though also probably more expensive to hang around in)
on another front, I have deadheaded the front roses. The first bloon is just about over.
The passenger has no special destination in London -- he's jusgt messing around on his way to California and back to Prague.
(our cheapest places to fly in and out of appeared to be London, Shannon, Dublin, Nice, Manchester, Krakow, and Malaga, in that order. The easiest places for him to get to, he said, were London and Krakow. London's cheaper than Krakow. Also probably simpler to wander in for a few days, though also probably more expensive to hang around in)
on another front, I have deadheaded the front roses. The first bloon is just about over.
I'd probably vote for Gatwick
And BTW, your assessment of me having a Mast year for cherries appears to be playing out. Our weather has been perfect, enough rain, no harsh freezes, it's been a bit chilly, which has delayed most things' ripening by about two weeks.
The tiny cherries are getting heavy. I'm already organizing a hen party to pick cherries (one of the gals I'm inviting is well over 6 feet tall...).
I used the last of the 2006 cherries about two months ago after Dr. P did a freezer inventory and found them -- putting a half-cup of sugar into the pitted cherries appears to act as a sufficient preservative.