When you assert that a woman gets away with a behavior because she has a "queen bee thing" going on, what are you saying about her? What is the equivalent language you would use for talking about a man? Is there an equivalent concept? If so, why can't I think of it? If not, why?
Context is, as James Nicoll says, for the weak.
Context is, as James Nicoll says, for the weak.
no subject
I hadn't heard about the queen bee thing. Is it about seeking power or about getting away with behavior?
no subject
It's interesting that your comparison is to a way of speaking about short men. It reinforces the thought I've been having that it's a kind of criticism reserved for people who have or attempt to have power that they're structurally not supposed to have.
no subject
So the contexts where I've heard the phrase would be more like, "She always has to be queen bee." Probably said of a woman who is trying to organise something, even if it was running fine without her help.
no subject
no subject
After the book Queen Bees and Wannabees (which inspired the movie Mean Girls), the phrase "Queen Bee" makes me think of the kinds of bullying that were talked about in that book: gossip, mocking, shunning; mostly verbal and always done in groups. Here, the bullying behaviors can be identified, but the source of the power to choose a target and get others to want to hurt that target is still mysterious.
If you're thinking of the same case I'm thinking of, someone threatened to drop the internet on my head for publicly disagreeing with her. I apologized and shut the fuck up, because she does in fact have that power.
no subject
no subject
Even though it's not the same.
He suppresses the weak, gets small when a person of authority is telling him he has more pull and the only one he ever takes really serious is only himself. Including he has some weaker spirits that always accompany him and everyone seems to admire him (secretly) because no-one wants to get into trouble with him.
Sort of like "a bully" which always drags a retinue behind himself.
If you can find that in the real world...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I can't think of equivalent genderswapped language because the genderswapped scenario doesn't really have a place in our society.
no subject
In my usage, the group don't necessarily agree that the queen bee is in fact the queen and therefore don't necessarily defer, though I could see that in some situations they may do. But then I've noticed that I tend never to get near the centre of any group, especially cliquey groups. I'm always on the fringes and it has been known for me to be a member of two groups, the leaders and the core members of which dislike one another but I flit happily between them, never getting deeply involved with either.