July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ritaxis: (hat)
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 01:31 pm
So, my glasses are another long boring This System Sucks and So Do I story.

With good vision insurance, my glasses cost nearly three hundred dollars. They're progressive bifocals with a prism. I failed to get new glasses when I last had insurance (there's the I suck part). My old glasses were only about two years old and they were still focussed about right. But suddenly they were very scratched. (It actually looks like the anti-scratch coating is what's scratch, honestly). So I stepped back to an older pair of glass, like four years old, that made me work for it but gave me good vision. But then they fell apart, and kept falling apart, so I went back to the newer glasses. They deteriorated rapidly.

The newer glasses are rapidly approaching opaque. I was taking them off for everything. So I was close to panic. I was wittering on about it and my roommate suggested the Lion's CLub eye care program. So I applied. And then I didn't hear anything, so I figured they weren't going to do it, or at least they weren't going to do it before I go to Prague.

I've been waiting for my stepmother's house to sell before I buy anything, but while that's not off the table there's no longer an estimated time when it will come through, so I had to borrow money to go to Prague, and while I was at it I borrowed a few hundred more than I strictly needed to buy the ticket, so I thought -- okay, I'll use that money. And Costco has cheaper glasses so I flailed around and bought a Costco membership and made an optometry appointment. The Lion's club fellow called and said they were sending a voucher. I asked about my trifocal progressives and he said he didn't know but maybe they would cover all that.

So I hae a Costco membership I don't want, but it's not the end of the world.

Now, the Lion's Club optometrist says I can't get my glasses before I leave for Prague and I can't get trifocal progressives but I can get bifocals with a line. So I can order those for backup glasses and pick them up when I get back, and take my prescription with me to Prague and try my luck there.

Meanwhile, I found an even older pair of glasses which is completely not scratched up. Clear as water. They're horrible for close up work, though, and even driving is uitimately painful with them. Last night I thought I had to take them off to write and then crawl into the screen and get a stiff neck, but today I find that if I sit very tall and tilt my head back I can read what I am writing. Painful but not as bad.

I have been urged to try contacts, and I have been told that trifocal contacts are the best thing in the world. I may be too old a dog to learn such a new trick, though.

And now I am unutterably sleepy so I better get up and move around.
ritaxis: (hat)
Friday, May 24th, 2013 11:04 am
Well, I was all about to write a whiny post about how much the "Covered California" plans were going to cost me and how much they wouldn't cover when I went back to check the exact numbers and found that I had somehow been directed to the wrong chart yesterday. Maybe. It looks like the new plan is actually going to work for me.

Currently my doctor and my pharmacy have been giving me hefty "uninsured discounts" and my medicine is actually costing me a wee bit less than it did when I was insured (not my doctor visits, though: they're almost three times as much, but still less than they could be). But according to this chart and the calculator on the site, I'd be paying about $75 a month for coverage, and then well less than I'm paying now for medicine and very much less for doctor visits than I paid before when I had insurance. Which is cool. I'm not one of those people who hangs around endlessly bugging their doctors, but I would like to be able to go in an discuss the complex of ongoing issues I have on a more regular basis. And maybe address with him a couple of them that I've just tended to grit my teeth or apply home care to because the big ones demand our attention.

I don't see any reference to dental or vision on there, though, and that's unfortunate, because teeth are such a vulnerable space -- you get mouth infections and they go to your heart, and that's not good. Also, glasses and quality of life, you know. (on that front, I've applied to the Lions club for vision subsidy, and I'm sure I qualify, but the big question is do they pay for the kind of glasses I need -- trifocals, continuous blend, and a prism? That's a pretty expensive ticket right there. My frames are good, but I've rarely been able to reuse them because they keep changing the shapes of the lens blanks so much that you just can't match them)

On another front, I am making oxtail and beef shank stew with plum wine and the usual vegetables and herbs. I used to eat a lot of oxtail when it was cheap. It was cheap this time, I don't know why.

And can I brag about my daughter? She's spying on penguins for the aquarium these days, that and scrubbing shit off rocks and tallying fish. But it's what she's always wanted to do, and the fact that she can do this now is a step closer to her being able to do it for a living.
ritaxis: (Default)
Wednesday, August 1st, 2007 10:14 am
You should be listening to Democracy Now anyway. Reading the site is good too. Today's lead story is about the privatization of water and the lies behind the bottled water boom.

Amy Goodman has quietly become a ubiquitous figure. She's a complement to Michael Moore. She's quiet, she's earnest, she's focussed. When she was interviewed by Steven Colbert, she indulged him but didn't give much in the way of snappy comebacks: it was kind of cute, actually, watching her. Meanwhile, she's on radio and TV every day with Juan Gonzalez, who has an unretouched but unexaggerated New York accent (one of about 35, I don't know which), and carried by more and more venues, she's part of this website, she has a newspaper column that is carried by I don't know how many papers. She's put a lot of effort into being not glamorous. Her hair is grey and cut in a simple fashion, if she wears makeup at all it's just enough to satisfy the TV cameras and their lighting. She starts out from the position that she has a position, so no false objectivity crap and no vicious undercutting of her allies in the name of evenhandedness.

But the research is good, the facts are true, and that's what counts in a news program. The "mainstream" media act as shills for the worst of the ruling class -- and their audience keeps shrinking, because if the news is going to be half as newsy as People magazine, you'll probably choose the happy fun one. And Democracy Now's share keeps growing, despite a conspicuous lack of showmanship, because it's interesting. It's interesting because you hear from people you wouldn't hear from elsewhere, you hear about things you wouldn't hear about elsewhere, and because it has it's own voice (slightly scratchy and definitely not perky, in the case of Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez).

On another front, I have my new glasses and my left eye is exhausted already from not having to yank itself into an unnatural position anymore. But it's the other lens, the one without the prism, which has rainbows on its edge. I may have to edge into using these glasses a little at a time.

And on a still further point, my guys have gotten into a side discussion of how personal "impersonal" art (botanical drawings, in this case) can be. They are completely unruly, these guys, and persist on being the people they really are despite the needs of a romantic comedy. They will not stay on message, even though this is supposed to be the grand reconciliation and resolution scene. They have three little words they have to say, but what do they say instead? Chiaroscuro:sketchy: frenetic.