July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ritaxis: (hat)
Saturday, December 1st, 2012 12:27 pm
The thing about Obamacare is that it doesn't really kick in till 2014. So, in 2013, I'm still dealing with the weird, weird, impossible old system.
much more rumination about health insurance than you want to read )

On another front, I am quite annoyed that "the Postman" as a badass post-apocalyptic fantasy figure appears to- have entered the amateur fiction writer's bag of stupid tricks. It's an Alarming Trend (i.e., I've seen more than one in the last week. Seem, not read. There are limits to my appetite for stupid free fiction) To the the extent that the book of that name worked, which is an arguable extent, it was because it was a surprise gimmick, and based on a premise which, frankly, doesn't really make too much sense in the light of subsequent developments since the stupid book was written.

Of course, I could do without any more post-apocalyptic crap at all for the rest of my life, thank you. I can just about stand to read normal war-torn landscapes, but I'd like to see reconstruction, thank you. And not, thnak you, self-suifficient isolated compounds defending themselves against boring old zombies, please.

On still another front, I realized after reading more of Fritz's memoirs about world war one, I had completely misunderstood how shrapnel works.  I had thought it was a side effect of shells whose main purpose was to cause damage by impact, but in fact, shrapnel is the whole point. This is what comes of insufficient research (or maybe, the correction is what comes of sufficient research).  I was looking for what it was like for the men on the gunner team, and focusing on the physicality and demands of loading and firing the gun: I missed out, until now, the actuality of what happens at the other end. It does require (fortunately subtle) changes all through this section of the book, but nothing I can't handle, and it actually solves some story problems. And that's soemthing I keep finding with this stuff. When I find out game-changing information, it almost never causes me to lose more than I gain in story.

People keep warning you that too much research will keep you from writing, but I haven't been finding this to be the case. But I don't think I'm doing too much research, either, so I may be not near to the phenomenon I'm being warned about.

And last: Truffle and I went to the parade. I was late as usual so we missed most of it but it was a nice outing anyway. She was ready to turn towards home before we had got to the end of the Avenue, so the whole walk was well less than two miles, but that's all right. I'm a little worried about her. She's thrown up several times in the last few days, which makes me worry not only about why she is doing that but also about whether she's retaining her medicine.  She's also a bit depressed acting, which might be the rain, or it might be nit getting out enough. I'll try addressing the latter and see how it goes.

I lied about that being the last thing. Youtube. Just youtube, what can I say? I found a "Scottish" playlist suggested because I was listening to Ewan MacColl singing about Dick Turpin, and it's mostly different not-amazing renditions of "A man's a man for a' that," which is a very nice song, and stirring, but the other songs on the list are mostly random Child ballads, so the total effect is kind of diluted and perplexing. And the other day I was listening to Rammstein and the suggested videos were all Sandy Denny.  I tested: for Sandy Denny, the suggested videos were all Rammstein.
ritaxis: (hat)
Friday, November 30th, 2012 07:37 am
I finally found almost exactly what I need: a memoir of an Austrian soldier on the Eastern front in World War One.  Better would have been a Russian soldier, but this fellow's memories are completely apposite.  He talks about the actual daily work of a soldier in rapidly-moving trench warfare (unlike the Western front where nobody could budge for ages and the trenches were much better equipped anyway). Unlike war buff sites, which have been somewhat helpful when they have archives of photographs but the narrative is often at the war-game level. Honestly, I don't care which division went where unless you tell me what they did when they had to travel through twenty miles of forest, or how they got across the wetlands or that valley with all the creeks in it -- usually they don't even tell you what the landscape was like at all, so it really is like a board game. They think they're telling me about the "human" side of the war when they relay some hoary story about somebody's brave quips. Which, of course, I've already heard, thank you.

I'm relieved to find that I extrapolated pretty well on the information I already had. I only came across a few things that have story-altering implications. I think I have underemphasized some things, and maybe overemphasized some others, but I'll judge that in revision. Right now I'm resisting the rapid deployment of some Cool Bits that I may include in the revision after I have thought them over wth a cooler head, or I may leave by the wayside. 

One thing I'm struck by is that this guy in no way demonizes the Russians. He's proud of the fact that while the Austrians he saw were patriotic and devoted to winning the war, they were not, in his words "jingoistic." I don't know if this is the last shreds of chjivalry persisting into the 20th century, or a bit of precocious post-nationalism, or just a different kind of war fever altogether. It seems to me that in the US today, the people who support the war are the other way around. They don't seem to really love their own country, or their own people (they do use some patriotic, country-loving language, but mostly they seem to despise most of the people in it and a large number of the institutions that are supposed to define it, and they certainly don't seem to have any great desire to preserve the land itself), but they believe the most hideous things about the people on the other side of the war. I think it's telling that ever since the (first? definitely the second) Bush presidency, we've been seeing a lot of use of the term "the bad guys" instead of the names of the people on the other side, or even "the enemy." And "the bad guys" is not being used ironically by these people.  Now, I don't for a minute believe that my Austrian soldier speaks for all of Austria in World War One, and I can't say, because I've never examined it before, how much of Austria thought like him and how much of the country thought in more jingoistic ways.  So I can't honestly say I have seen a way to contrast the state of my country now with the state of that country then.  I guess I have to say I'm struck by the contrast between this guy in this memoir and some other fellows I have read about in my time and place and leave it at that, and not make generalizations like I just started to do.

Another thing I'm struck by is the terrible, terrible font this memoir is presented in. Why? It's small and muddy and dark and it takes way too much effort to read. I almost gave up. Instead I copied the text into my own word processor, and I'm really glad I did. I'm not generally a font snob -- I mean, I like Comic Sans -- but this was way too nasty and difficult.

Oh, yeah, it's the 30th so I have to account for the month, Really didn't nano, but oh my the research I have done.  I only wish I knew over a year ago that I needed to research this stuff, but at that time I thought "I'll avoid most of the war -- knock out a couple battle scenes, and then get on with the real story." I understand, of course, that that is intolerably naive. I probably actually knew it at the time. I probably thought I was going to skate by with a little bit of skimming things for Cool Bits.

But Cool Bits only decorates a story. To actually drive a story you need to know what you're talking about.
ritaxis: (Default)
Saturday, November 24th, 2012 11:38 am
Mucked up some stuff about how long a person stays in a trench, got the military organization kind of muddied and it needs to be clarified, well, it'll still be muddy but in the ways that I mean for it to be muddy instead of ways that I don't that might get in the way of a reader accepting the scenes, didn't deal with a thing I wanted to have dealt with before now -- the feudal-remnants aspect of military organization, think I need to better foreshadow this bad thing that's about to happen and also make it more unacceptable by making the guy it's happening to more of a presence, missed an opportunity to foreshadow something that happens a lot later, and I think some stuff seems to happen by magic and it ought to happen by normal processes? and I really just need to make some decisions, really, about what these trenches really look like because the waffling might be showing in the staging.

Other than that, it'll do until I'm ready to go rewrite that stuff. Right now, trying to set up, astage, and pace the very bad thing, along with another very bad thing, and figure out what kind of retreat the army is in at the moment -- a rout, or an organized one. The problem with not using actual history is that you have to make these decisions yourself instead of having a nice constrained timeline of what really happened.

I was always anti-war.  Not the kind that admits of no time when people need to or ought to fight. But the kind that hits the streets and carries the signs. But right now, because I have no boundaries about the little fake people I write about:right now I'm for taking every general there ever was, and most statesmen, and putting them all on trial, with the burden of proof on them. People who always read this stuff will not be surprised that the major source of my rage is the Eastern Front of World War One. Where the official strategy is to send men into the front lines with no equipment and the instructions to pick up stuff from the corpses around them. And "trench" means "trench," not "cement-lined bunker with cots and tables."

The thing is, there are times and places where men have to undergo this kind of experience because the alternative is unimaginably bad.  And then there's World War One, which was a game played by incestuous cousins on the outs with each other.

And there's also miners, even to this day, who in many places live just like that, minus the artillery, also to further enrich people who already have too much.

(but this book isn't about this, it's not an anti-war book, the war is just there because it is, but once there's a war, how can you skip over it and just write the fun stuff? Oy, I wish Bertolt Brecht was alive and would write me a poem to make fun of me and help me figure out what the hell I'm doing*)

*From To Posterity

Indeed I live in the dark ages!
A guileless word is an absurdity. A smooth forehead betokens
A hard heart. He who laughs
Has not yet heard
The terrible tidings.

Ah, what an age it is
When to speak of trees is almost a crime
For it is a kind of silence about injustice!
And he who walks calmly across the street,
Is he not out of reach of his friends
In trouble?