July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ritaxis: (Default)
Tuesday, December 7th, 2010 09:38 pm
For some reason this is the time of years when everybody and his mother's brother has a writing workshop they want to let you know about for next year.  maybe this is the time of year they hire the instructors for next year, I don't know.

Anyway, not a single one of them: not Odyssey, not Clarion West, not Clarion, not Viable Paradise, not a single one of them is ever going to be possible for me ever, because I will never ever have that much money at my disposal and also that much time I do not have to be working.   And also.  . . .

It would be nice to be a part of a community of writers again sometime, but the last time I was in a writing group it totally broke me.  I don't understand how that worked.  Everybody in the group was nice and friendly, and the things they were writing were really interesting, but there was not a bit of commentary I received that didn't depress me completely.  And the two novels I brought to that group died, though I am pretty sure they were both had great potential.

I really don't know why that happened.  And so naturally I am wary of writing groups after that, because if that could happen with people I respected so much and who were so kind, and I don't know why, then how can I expect any other writing group situation not to do the same thing to me?
ritaxis: (Default)
Thursday, October 26th, 2006 05:34 pm
So my writing group tells me that was and were are bad, not altogether, but need to be very sparely used. Afterwar has a lot of description and a lot of past progressive tense. So I'm trying to replace almost every incidence of was and were with other verb things.

But I want that past progressive.

I do think they're on to something, though the thing they're on to is not what they say it is ("sentences in the passive"). I have been struggling to make the story more robust and frightening, and I tend to fail, I think because of my own personality defects, really.

I think I've figured out something that might satisfy the need to liven the prose as well as my need for the past progressive: retaining the past progressive structure but replacing the auxiliary verb with an "active" verb. We'll see.

But I refuse to join them in calling sentences with the structure "He was a bureaucrat" or "He was pulling the wagon" passive. Passive is "He was called a bureaucrat" or "The wagon was being pulled by him." That's a fact of grammar, not an opinion about style.