July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ritaxis: (hat)
Monday, June 8th, 2015 11:53 am
I followed somebody's crotchet about Anish Kapoor's installation at Versailles to this BBC article, in which they confidently state that the title of the sculpture is "Dirty Corner." I thought that was strange given the things that he is quoted as saying about it. He says it represents the queen's vagina coming to power, and it is open to interpretation as is art in general. So anyway, the BBC article said that in France he's getting both positive and negative critiques, and there's a link to this article. My French is not great, so I only skimmed the article, but what stood out to me was the name of the sculpture. No, it's not "Coin Sale," it's "le vagin de la reine."

Immediately I have two overlapping theories: somebody got the title from a machine translation, or somebody deliberately sabotaged the work (and the integrity of the news article) by using the term. Only if I put "le vagin de la reine" into google translate I get "the queen's vagina." "Dirty Corner" isn't even in a list of suggestions.

Not to mention the phrases are almost perfect cognates anyway.

I call shenanigans.
ritaxis: (hat)
Saturday, August 16th, 2014 09:29 am
I get the BBC world newsfeed in my livejournal flist.

This is problematic not least for the reason that whatever headline they think is most interesting will run over and over and over as they update it every fifteen minutes.

And so, if they decide something stupid and prejudicial and discredited is the most interesting thing ever they will run that over and over and over.

What is it since yesterdary (or the day before -- another thing this practice does is confuse the passage of time, as it simultaneously seems to rush forward while the same thing seems to happen over and over and to stand stock still as the news remains the same for soimetimes days at a time) --

the allegation that the kid murdered by police was a robbery suspect. It's in every headline from Ferguson "Police confront demonstrators as teen is identified as robbery suspect" "Dead teen identified as robbery suspect."

This is how long after the police chief has already disclaimed this?

Oh wait, it's gone now. I just went back to get the exact wording of the headlines and there are none referring to it anymore, no matter how far back I go,

Completely, utterly gone, even from the past stream.

Took them a while to see that they were doing the wrong thing, but I guess now they're utterly embarrassed by it.
ritaxis: (hat)
Saturday, April 20th, 2013 11:32 am
I was listening to a BBC reporter talking about the earthquake in China. Aside fromthe awfulness of the event, I was really struck by his accent, which was one I was sure I had never heard before. It was I guess "thick" in that every sound of every word was particular to the accent, but it was also perfectly comprehensible to me which would I guess mean that it isn't thick? The point is, I thought it was a really nice way of speaking, and I could listen to him all night long.

It seemed like his sentences had a rhythm like Irish speakers, but his pronunciations sounded more like Northern England (please remember I have no right to make judgements like this as my exposure is so slight). He did something odd: he pronounced urban with an H. Like Hurban. I'd never heard that sound attached to a word beginning with that vowel. So I paid attention at the end of the segment, learned his name, and trolled the BBC website and eventually Google till I learned that his name is Martin Patience and he's originally from Glasgow.

But I don't know what kind of Glaswegian accent he has (or if it's really a Glasgow accent or something else). So if you know Scottish accents, would you please listen to a Martin Patience piece and tell me what you think?

I know this is a distraction. But I dearly love the way that man talks and I'd just like to know more about it and searching online has been less than helpful.
ritaxis: (Default)
Saturday, March 19th, 2011 03:51 pm
I've been trying to leave the radio on as a way to try to anchor myself to the real world.  I tuned it to Radio Stevenson School, which is a private high school station that runs the BBC feed most of the time.

On a forty-five-minute repeat: intense propaganda to pimp the war on Libya.

edit: on the other hand I finally updated firefox and it does go smoother.
ritaxis: (Default)
Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011 10:57 pm
The article about Shawna Forde getting the death penalty labels her as a "migration activist."

I complained.


Just to be clear: as vicious and irredeemable as Shawna Forde is, I don't think she should have the death penalty, because the death penalty is wrong and barbaric.
ritaxis: (Default)
Sunday, October 17th, 2010 10:05 am
I get news feeds from Reuters and BBC.  They like to repost certain stories over and over without much change in the content, I don't know why: maybe to keep them from falling off the front page.

This weekend they're all for giving free publicity to the latest venomous lies spewing from that heroine of free enterprise Angela Merkel.  Angela Merkel says "we've tried and tried and tried so hard and yet we are completely unable to recognize our fellow humans as humn, because they persist in being different from us.  The German multicultural society has failed."

This is so much bullshit on so many levels.  One: her ilk has not tried at all.  Her ilk is no more interested in multuiculturalism than they are interested in peace and justice.  For some years, back when capitalists still thought markets mattered -- before their weird embrace of a belief in some sort of economic singularity -- they did embrace a kind of shallow inclusivity, because look! cheap labor, and also more people to sell things to!

But some time in the last twenty-thirty years the idiots have decided they don't need workers or consumers anymore, and they can let them all go starve on the streets and they can systematically destroy infrastructure, manufacturing, even the service industries that twenty years ago they said were the next great thing -- hell, they can destrioy the physical world -- so now the only use they have for diversity is as a bogheyman to manipulate people with.  They get lots of benefits out of burgeoning racism.  The chief one is that they convince the most desperate to turn their attention from how we got into this mess and who got us here, to finding people in their neighborhood to hate on and struggle against.  

"Look over there!  Your pharmacist is brown and talks funny!  He is undermining your sacred national values!  Never mind that he was born here, and sponsors the local Little League team.  Down the street!  Thiose guys loitering on the corner by the lumber yard aren't just laborers looking for a day's work to support their families, they're aliens intent on swamping the welfare system (never mind that they don't receive anything like proportional benefits for the taxes they pay, and they do pay them).  Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

Meanwhile, they'll give you brains of sawdust so you will find logic in anything Christine O'Donnel or Sharon Angle or Sarah Palin say: a heart a heart of unrecyclable styrofoam so it will repel the tears of the evicted, the fired, the murdered, and the abandoned: and courage made of the drugs we're supposedly having a war on, but we know how they got on to the street and where the Zetas really got their start.

Why does the BBC think there is merit in broadcasting this headline every couple of hours? From the tone of the article, they're doing what all the mainstream media have been doing lately (and by lately I mean the last decade).  They're not exposing this monster for what she is.  That would be journalism.  Instead, they're depicting her as the voice of a force of nature, a regretable but unstoppable trend which they will by turns admire and abhor as it gathers momentum and lights the world on fire again.

When Roma and Senegalese workers are murdered all over Europe by thugs with swastikas, neither Sarkozy or Merkel will take the blame.  Nor will the BBC.  You know who they'll blame? The Roma and the Senegalese. 

One last note: notice, please that Angela Merkel is saying this because she has to compete with Nicholas Sarkozy, but if the German government rounded up Roma and deported them the historical resonance would be too obvious for even the BBC to miss, and nobody would believe a word of the trumped-up excuses about housing being below code and unpermitted.