July 2024

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ritaxis: (Default)
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 08:53 am
I haven't wanted to say anything about the "racefail" crap because it's crap and there's no way to address the crappiness of it without getting told that you're saying somethign that you're not.

But eventually I will have to discuss race and the rest, here, in my own terms. Not necessarily racefail -- I'm not a participant in any of the social circles where this has been playing out, so I may not have to engage that at all -- but because I have been reflecting on race, color, language, ethnicity, class and caste with both hands -- I have to: my job (my calling) demands it. I can't avoid it.


I no longer have much ambition to someday get to Wiscon, though. Not because of any particular event, but because it doesn't sound like the exciting intellectual place that it used to sound like. It frankly sounds dreary. And the people who are defending it the most sound the dreariest, though not the only dreary ones. Which is a loss for me, but I haven't even made it to BayCon since the nice fellow died, so the loss of the idea of Wiscon is probably not that huge.
ritaxis: (Default)
Monday, February 19th, 2007 10:41 am
So, based on the advice my kind friends here have given me, I've been looking into flying to someplace else and busing it from there to Madison.

It's $60 cheaper to fly to Milwaukee than to Minneapolis, which is really weird because to fly from San Jose to Milwaukee you have to change planes in Minneapolis. Why can't I just get the ticket for the first plane? For grim curiosity's sake, I looked up the air fare from Minneapolis to Milwaukee: they have a flight which takes you to Chicago and then to Milwaukee, for, again, $60 less going straight from Minneapolis to Milwaukee. What the hell?

Oh, and the Greyhound from Milwaukee to Madison is just fine, but from Madison to Milwaukee it doesn't meet the plane unless I stay the night in Milwaukee.

Flying from San Jose to Chicago is about the same cost, so there's no saving, but it looks like the bus might meet the plane better. Flying from San Francisco to Chicago is still more expensive. From Oakland to Chicago is the same as from San Jose.

Taking the bus all the way from California is a two-day trip each way. The train from San Jose requires four changes, from Oakland three changes, and in either case takes two days also.

Driving is out of the question, even if it wasn't a two-day trip each way.

I'm not sure I can't swing the Chicago option. I'm pretty sure I can't, though.
Tags:
ritaxis: (Default)
Sunday, February 18th, 2007 10:56 pm
If I could figure out a way to go to Wiscon, I could be part of the reading for Glorifying Terrorism. The nice fellow said it couldn't be that expensive. It's not only expensive, it's difficult and time-consuming to get to Madison from here. Flying from San Jose costs $400 round-trip, with three airplanes and almost 9 hours travel each way. From San Francisco it's a lot cheaper but you have to leave at 1 in the morning and fly to Dallas/Ft. Worth and hang out there for four hours for more than 9 hours total. Oakland is worse.

I had thought about flying someplace close-ish and taking a bus, but I can't figure that one out either.

The bus takes two days each way.

I just don't understand routing a flight from San Jose to Madison through Dallas. It adds 700 miles to the trip. Why not route the flight through someplace more on the way?

Baycon is nice.
Tags: